top of page
Search

A Comparative Analysis of Data Pre-processing Frameworks for Retrieval-Augmented Generation: Chonkie, Docling, and Unstructured

  • Writer: Rajesh Kommineni
    Rajesh Kommineni
  • Jul 19
  • 34 min read

Updated: Jul 24




1. Executive Summary & Strategic Overview



1.1. Purpose of the Report


This report provides a definitive, expert-level comparison of three prominent Python libraries in the Generative AI data pre-processing landscape: Chonkie, Docling, and Unstructured. The analysis is intended for technical leaders, solutions architects, and principal AI engineers who are tasked with evaluating and selecting foundational technologies for developing sophisticated Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) pipelines and other Large Language Model (LLM) applications. The objective is to move beyond surface-level feature lists to deliver a nuanced understanding of each library's core philosophy, architectural trade-offs, performance characteristics, and enterprise readiness, thereby enabling informed, strategic decision-making. This is a AI Generated Documentation. It is generated with Gemini 2.5 Pro with Deep Research.


1.2. Key Findings at a Glance


The analysis reveals that while all three libraries operate within the domain of data preparation for AI, they represent distinct and specialized solutions rather than direct, one-to-one competitors. Their core value propositions can be summarized as follows:

  • Chonkie: A specialized, high-performance chunking engine. It excels in the "Transform" stage of an ETL pipeline, offering superior speed, a lightweight footprint, and a comprehensive suite of advanced, context-aware chunking algorithms. It is the best-in-class choice when the primary challenge is to intelligently and efficiently segment pre-extracted text.1

  • Docling: An AI-powered, high-fidelity document conversion toolkit. Its primary strength lies in the "Extract" stage, particularly for parsing complex, structured documents like PDFs containing tables, multi-column layouts, and scientific formulas. By leveraging state-of-the-art, purpose-built AI models, it achieves unparalleled accuracy in preserving a document's structural and semantic integrity.4

  • Unstructured: A comprehensive, end-to-end ETL platform for LLMs. Its defining characteristic is its immense breadth of connectivity, supporting the ingestion of over 64 file types from more than 50 source and destination connectors. It aims to be a universal data ingestion layer, abstracting the complexity of connecting to disparate enterprise data sources.7


1.3. Strategic Decision Framework


The choice between these libraries is not a matter of determining which is "best" overall, but which is optimal for a specific task within a broader architectural context. The strategic decision hinges on three core trade-offs:

  1. Specialist Performance vs. High-Fidelity Parsing vs. Generalist Connectivity: The fundamental choice is whether the primary engineering challenge is chunking speed and sophistication (Chonkie), the accurate interpretation of complex document layouts (Docling), or the integration of a wide array of data sources (Unstructured).

  2. The Emergence of Hybrid Architectures: A key finding is that these tools are often most powerful when used sequentially. A best-of-breed pipeline for complex documents involves using Docling for high-fidelity parsing, followed by Chonkie for advanced chunking. This hybrid pattern leverages the unique strengths of each library to achieve a result superior to what any single tool could produce alone.10

  3. Open-Source Philosophy vs. Commercial Platform Strategy: The libraries represent different business models that impact their feature availability and path to production. Chonkie and Docling offer fully-featured, production-ready open-source libraries, with commercial offerings focused on managed services and support. Unstructured employs an "open core" model, where the open-source library is a starting point, and advanced features, performance, and compliance are key drivers for its commercial platform.12


1.4. Key Recommendation Synopsis


This report culminates in a detailed decision matrix designed to guide technology selection. In summary, the recommendations are as follows:

  • Choose Chonkie when the primary requirement is best-in-class text chunking performance, access to the latest semantic and agentic chunking algorithms, or deployment in resource-constrained environments (e.g., serverless, edge) where a lightweight footprint is critical.

  • Choose Docling when the source material consists of complex, structured documents (e.g., scientific papers, financial reports, legal contracts) where preserving the exact layout, reading order, and table data is paramount for downstream RAG quality.

  • Choose Unstructured when the main challenge is integrating a diverse and extensive set of data sources (e.g., Salesforce, Notion, SharePoint) with minimal development overhead, or when a commercially supported, compliant (e.g., SOC 2, HIPAA) platform is a mandatory requirement.

For organizations seeking the highest possible quality for RAG systems built on complex documents, a hybrid architecture combining Docling's parsing with Chonkie's chunking represents the current state-of-the-art approach.


2. Foundational Analysis: Philosophy and Architectural Design


The strategic value and technical behavior of each library are direct consequences of its foundational philosophy and architectural design. Understanding these core principles is essential for predicting how each tool will perform, scale, and integrate into a larger system. Chonkie is architected as a specialist engine, Docling as an AI-powered toolkit, and Unstructured as an end-to-end platform.


2.1. Chonkie: The Specialist Chunking Engine


Core Philosophy: Chonkie's design is a direct response to the perceived complexity and performance overhead of larger, monolithic AI frameworks. Its philosophy is explicitly stated as being a "no-nonsense ultra-light and lightning-fast chunking library" that "just works".1 The project's messaging targets developers who are "Tired of making your gazillionth chunker? Sick of the overhead of large libraries?".1 This positions Chonkie not as a comprehensive platform, but as a highly optimized, specialized tool designed to solve one problem—text chunking—exceptionally well. The emphasis is on speed, efficiency, a minimal dependency footprint, and ease of use, aiming to eliminate bloat and provide a focused, high-performance component for RAG pipelines.2

Architectural Approach: The CHOMP Pipeline: To achieve its goals of flexibility and efficiency, Chonkie employs a modular, multi-step pipeline named CHOMP (CHOnkie's Multi-step Pipeline).1 This linear, configurable workflow transforms raw text into refined, usable chunks. The key stages are:

  1. Document: The entry point for raw text data. The library itself does not perform file parsing; it expects text to be extracted by an upstream process.1

  2. Chef: An optional but recommended pre-processing stage for text cleaning, normalization, and other preparatory steps before chunking.1

  3. Chunker: The core component where the user selects a specific chunking algorithm (e.g., RecursiveChunker, SemanticChunker) to split the text.1

  4. Refinery: A post-processing stage that can merge small chunks, add embeddings, or enrich chunks with additional context, ensuring the quality and consistency of the final output.1

  5. Friends: The final stage for exporting the processed chunks. This includes Porters for saving chunks to formats like JSON and Handshakes for providing a unified interface to ingest chunks directly into vector databases such as Chroma, Qdrant, and pgVector.1

This modular architecture allows developers to construct a custom chunking process by mixing and matching components, reinforcing the library's philosophy of providing a powerful, focused toolkit.


2.2. Docling: The AI-Powered Document Conversion Toolkit


Core Philosophy: Docling originates from IBM Research and is now hosted by the LF AI & Data Foundation, and its philosophy reflects this academic and open-source heritage.15 It is designed as a "self-contained, MIT-licensed, open-source toolkit for document conversion" that parses diverse document formats into a "unified, richly structured representation".4 Unlike tools that treat documents as simple text streams, Docling's approach is rooted in scientific rigor and high-fidelity, model-driven document understanding. A central tenet is the ability to run entirely locally on commodity hardware, ensuring data privacy and making it suitable for air-gapped environments.5

Architectural Approach: Model-Centric Pipeline: Docling's architecture is fundamentally model-centric, built around state-of-the-art AI models that work in concert to deconstruct a document into a rich, structured object.5

  1. Parser Backends: The pipeline begins with a parser backend responsible for extracting raw text tokens and their geometric coordinates, as well as rendering page images for visual analysis. To ensure performance and quality, Docling provides its own custom C++-based parser, docling-parse, as the default, with an alternative based on pypdfium for compatibility.16

  2. AI Model Sequence: The rendered page images and text are then passed through a sequence of powerful, specialized AI models. The two cornerstone models are DocLayNet, an object detector based on RT-DETR for layout analysis, and TableFormer, a vision-transformer for recognizing complex table structures.4 These models identify and classify elements like paragraphs, titles, lists, figures, and tables with high accuracy.

  3. DoclingDocument: The output of the model pipeline is aggregated into a DoclingDocument, a Pydantic-based data model that serves as the architectural centerpiece.5 This is not a simple string of text but a rich, hierarchical object that captures the document's structure, layout information (bounding boxes), element types, and provenance (page numbers). This structured object becomes the single source of truth for all downstream operations, such as exporting to Markdown or performing context-aware chunking.


2.3. Unstructured: The End-to-End Unstructured Data ETL Platform


Core Philosophy: Unstructured aims to be a comprehensive, universal solution for data ingestion and pre-processing for LLMs. Its philosophy is one of breadth and connectivity, providing an "open-source ETL solution for transforming complex documents into clean, structured formats".9 It seeks to handle the entire workflow, from connecting to a vast array of data sources to partitioning files and loading them into downstream systems.7 The project explicitly frames its open-source library as a "starting point for quick prototyping," strongly encouraging users to adopt its commercial API and platform for production scenarios, which offer higher performance and more advanced features.12

Architectural Approach: Partitioning and Ingestion Workflow: Unstructured's architecture is designed around the concept of "bricks" (modular functions) and a comprehensive ingestion pipeline, with the partition function at its heart.7

  1. Partitioning: The partition function is the primary entry point. It automatically detects a document's file type and routes it to a specialized function (e.g., partition_pdf, partition_docx). This process leverages various underlying models and tools (e.g., Tesseract OCR, computer vision models) to break the document down into a flat list of "document elements" (e.g., Title, NarrativeText, Table) with associated metadata.7

  2. Core Functions: Once a document is partitioned into elements, a suite of subsequent functions can be applied: cleaning (to sanitize text), extracting (to pull specific entities), staging (to format for downstream use), and chunking (to group elements).12

  3. Ingestion Pipeline: For production use, Unstructured provides a full ETL workflow, exposed via a CLI and Python library. This formalizes the process into discrete, configurable steps: Index (discover files in a source), Download (fetch files locally), Partition, Chunk, and Embed. This pipeline is powered by a large library of source connectors (e.g., S3, GitHub, Salesforce) and destination connectors (e.g., vector databases), which is a core part of its value proposition.8


2.4. Comparative Architectural Overview


The differing philosophies of these libraries manifest in distinct architectural patterns. Chonkie's focus on being a specialist library results in a lean, linear pipeline (CHOMP) that excels at a specific task. Docling's focus on being a high-fidelity toolkit leads to a model-heavy architecture that produces a rich, intermediate data object (DoclingDocument). Unstructured's ambition to be an end-to-end platform results in a broad, connector-driven architecture designed to manage the entire data flow from source to destination.

This distinction between a library, a toolkit, and a platform is fundamental. A developer uses Chonkie or Docling to perform a specific, high-quality operation within a larger, self-managed pipeline. In contrast, a developer uses Unstructured to build and manage the entire pipeline itself, trading some fine-grained control and specialist performance for breadth of connectivity and a more integrated experience. This has profound implications for integration effort, operational complexity, and the degree of control a development team retains over its data processing workflow.

Table 1: Architectural and Pipeline Comparison

Feature

Chonkie

Docling

Unstructured

Core Philosophy

Lightweight, high-performance, specialist chunking engine. "No-nonsense" and "no bloat".1

High-fidelity, AI-powered document conversion toolkit. Focus on accuracy and local-first processing.4

Comprehensive, end-to-end ETL platform for LLMs. Focus on breadth of connectivity and file support.7

Primary Architectural Unit

The CHOMP Pipeline: A linear, modular sequence of text processing stages.1

AI Model Sequence: A pipeline of specialized models (DocLayNet, TableFormer) for analysis.5

The Ingestion Workflow: A connector-driven pipeline with partition as the core function.22

Key Stages

Document -> Chef -> Chunker -> Refinery -> Friends (Porters/Handshakes).1

Parse -> AI Model Analysis (Layout, Table) -> Post-processing -> Output.5

Index -> Download -> Filter -> Partition -> Chunk -> Embed -> Load.22

Central Data Object

Chunk: A simple object containing text and metadata (e.g., token_count).3

DoclingDocument: A rich, hierarchical Pydantic object representing the full document structure.5

List[Element]: A flat list of partitioned elements (e.g., Title, NarrativeText, Table).12

Extensibility Model

Modular pipeline with pluggable Chunkers, Refineries, and Handshakes.1

Extensible through a plugin system and custom serializers/chunkers.24

Extensive library of source and destination connectors; custom models via UnstructuredObjectDetectionModel.8

Ideal Architectural Role

A high-performance "Transform" component for advanced text chunking within a larger pipeline.

A high-fidelity "Extract" component for parsing complex documents into a structured format.

A universal ingestion platform managing the entire data flow from a wide variety of sources to destinations.


3. Ingestion and Parsing Capabilities: From Raw File to Structured Content


The initial step in any RAG pipeline is converting raw source files into clean, structured content. The capabilities of each library in this "Extract" phase differ dramatically, with Docling and Unstructured offering extensive parsing features while Chonkie specializes in processing already-extracted text. The quality of this initial parsing step is critical, as errors introduced here will inevitably propagate downstream, negatively impacting chunking quality and the ultimate performance of the RAG system.


3.1. Breadth of Support: A File Format Compatibility Analysis


The ability to handle a wide range of input formats is a primary consideration for any data processing framework. In this regard, Unstructured offers the greatest breadth, followed by Docling, while Chonkie remains focused on text.

  • Chonkie: Is fundamentally a text-processing library and does not perform file parsing natively. Its CHOMP pipeline begins with a Document object, which is expected to contain pre-extracted text.1 While its documentation states the input "can be in any format," this implies that the user is responsible for using an external tool (like Apache Tika or, ironically, Docling) to first convert the file to text.1 The library'sCodeChunker demonstrates a specialized capability, supporting the parsing of numerous programming and markup languages as structured text, including Python, TypeScript, JavaScript, Rust, Go, Java, C/C++, C#, HTML, CSS, and Markdown.27 However, a feature request on its GitHub repository to add direct support for formats like PDF, Markdown, and HTML confirms that this is a future goal rather than a current capability, reinforcing its position as a post-extraction tool.28

  • Docling: Possesses extensive and high-fidelity parsing capabilities as one of its core strengths. It officially supports a wide variety of common enterprise and academic formats, including PDF, DOCX, PPTX, XLSX, HTML, various image types (PNG, TIFF, JPEG), and audio files (WAV, MP3).15 It also handles plain text formats like AsciiDoc and Markdown.30 This broad support makes it a powerful and versatile tool for the initial data extraction phase.

  • Unstructured: Features the most exhaustive list of supported file formats among the three, positioning itself as a nearly universal parser. It claims support for over 64 file types.31 This includes all the common formats handled by Docling, but extends significantly to a "long tail" of less common formats, such as Apple Works (.cwk), dBase (.dbf), Rich Text Format (.rtf), OpenOffice documents (.odt), and many more.32 This exceptional breadth is a key strategic differentiator, making it a compelling choice for organizations dealing with heterogeneous and legacy data sources.


3.2. Fidelity of Extraction: Layout, Table, and Multimodal Recognition


Beyond simply supporting a file type, the quality and accuracy of the extraction are paramount. This is where the libraries diverge most significantly, with Docling's AI-driven approach providing superior fidelity, especially for complex documents.

  • Chonkie: As a text-only processor, this is not applicable. It relies on upstream tools for layout and table recognition.11

  • Docling: This is Docling's signature feature and primary value proposition. It delivers "advanced PDF understanding" by using specialized AI models to analyze document layout, infer reading order, recognize table structures, identify code blocks and mathematical formulas, and classify images.4 A comprehensive third-party benchmark focusing on complex sustainability reports found that Docling achieved an exceptional 97.9% accuracy on complex table cell extraction, preserving hierarchical structure and column order with high fidelity.6 It can intelligently distinguish between the main content of a page and peripheral "furniture" like headers and footers, preventing this noise from contaminating the extracted text.5 Furthermore, its support forSmolDocling (a Visual Language Model) and ASR models for audio processing underscores its robust multimodal capabilities.15

  • Unstructured: Provides robust extraction capabilities, leveraging a combination of OCR and computer vision models to identify a variety of document elements and their associated metadata.12 However, its performance on complex documents can be inconsistent. The same benchmark that highlighted Docling's accuracy found that Unstructured struggled with complex tables, achieving only 75% cell accuracy and suffering from "severe column shift" errors that rendered tables uninterpretable.6 The report also noted issues with inconsistent line breaks and misclassification of section structures. This is corroborated by user reports, with one developer on Reddit expressing frustration with Unstructured's inability to handle their documents correctly, particularly with tables and header-based chunking.37

The principle of "Garbage In, Garbage Out" is critically important in RAG pipelines. The quality of the initial parsing and extraction directly determines the quality of the data available for chunking and embedding. If a parser incorrectly interprets a table, merges text from adjacent columns, or fails to follow the correct reading order, it feeds corrupted data into the subsequent stages. No matter how sophisticated the chunking algorithm is, it cannot recover from this initial loss of semantic and structural integrity. For use cases involving documents with complex layouts, such as financial reports, legal filings, or scientific papers, the high-fidelity parsing offered by a tool like Docling is not merely a "nice-to-have" feature but a fundamental prerequisite for building a high-quality, reliable RAG system.


3.3. The Role of Underlying AI Models in Parsing


The difference in extraction fidelity can be traced directly to the underlying AI models each library employs.

  • Docling: Relies on a tightly integrated, purpose-built, and open-source model stack developed by IBM Research. The primary models are DocLayNet, an RT-DETR-based object detector trained on a massive, human-annotated dataset for document layout analysis, and TableFormer, a specialized vision-transformer model designed explicitly for table structure recognition.4 This use of highly specialized, state-of-the-art models for specific sub-tasks is the key technical driver behind its superior accuracy.

  • Unstructured: Employs a more generalized and flexible suite of models, including the open-source detectron2 from Facebook AI, YOLO-X for object detection, and its own in-house Chipper model, which is a transformer-based Visual Document Understanding (VDU) model.26 This approach provides broad capabilities but may lack the specialized precision of Docling'sTableFormer on the specific task of table recognition. The platform also relies on external system dependencies like the Tesseract engine for its core OCR functionality, making its performance contingent on the quality of these third-party tools.7

This analysis reveals a clear and complementary workflow pattern for building state-of-the-art pipelines. Rather than viewing these libraries as mutually exclusive competitors, a more sophisticated architectural approach is to use them sequentially. For complex documents, the optimal pipeline involves using a high-fidelity parser like Docling or Unstructured for the initial "Extract" and "Transform" (parsing) stages to produce clean, structurally-aware text (e.g., in Markdown format). This clean text is then passed to a specialized, high-performance chunker like Chonkie for the next "Transform" (chunking) stage. This "Parse then Chunk" pattern, explicitly described by users in community forums, allows developers to combine the best-in-class capabilities of each tool, maximizing both extraction fidelity and chunking quality.10

Table 2: Comprehensive Supported File Format Matrix

File Category

File Extension(s)

Chonkie

Docling

Unstructured

Plain Text

.txt

Yes (Native)

Yes

Yes

Code

.py, .js, .ts, .rs, .go, .java, .c, .cpp, .cs

Yes (Native via CodeChunker) 27

Indirect (Parses as text block)

Indirect (Parses as text)

Markup

.md, .html, .xml, .rst

Yes (Native via CodeChunker for MD/HTML) 27

Yes (.html, .md) 29

Yes (.md, .html, .xml, .rst) 35

PDF

.pdf

Indirect (Requires pre-extraction) 28

Yes (Core Feature) 15

Yes

Word Processing

.docx, .doc

Indirect

Yes (.docx) 15

Yes (also .odt, .rtf, .docm, etc.) 32

Spreadsheets

.xlsx, .xls

Indirect

Yes (.xlsx) 15

Yes (also .csv, .tsv) 35

Presentations

.pptx

Indirect

Yes 15

Yes (also .ppt) 35

Images

.png, .jpg, .jpeg, .tiff, .bmp

No

Yes 15

Yes (also .heic) 35

Audio

.wav, .mp3

No

Yes 15

No

Email

.eml, .msg

Indirect

No

Yes (also .p7s) 35

eBook

.epub

Indirect

No

Yes 35

Other Notable

N/A

N/A

AsciiDoc 30

Apple Works (.cwk), dBase (.dbf), Org Mode (.org) 32

Note: "Indirect" for Chonkie indicates that the library can process the content if the text is first extracted from the file using another tool.


4. The Core Differentiator: A Deep Dive into Chunking Methodologies


While parsing is a critical first step, the process of chunking—dividing a document into smaller, semantically meaningful segments—is the central challenge that these libraries aim to solve, particularly for RAG applications. The quality of chunks directly influences retrieval accuracy; chunks that are too large may contain irrelevant noise, while chunks that are too small or that split concepts arbitrarily may lack necessary context. The libraries offer a range of strategies, from foundational rule-based methods to cutting-edge, AI-driven techniques, with Chonkie providing the most diverse and advanced toolkit.


4.1. Foundational Strategies: Fixed-Size, Recursive, and Element-Based Chunking


These strategies form the baseline for most chunking tasks and are supported in some form by all three libraries.

  • Chonkie: Provides a highly optimized TokenChunker for fixed-size splitting based on token count and a powerful RecursiveChunker.1 TheRecursiveChunker is particularly flexible, operating on a hierarchical list of separators (e.g., ["\n\n", "\n", " "]). It is highly customizable, allowing developers to define their own rules and separators, making it exceptionally effective for structured text formats like Markdown, where chunking can be guided by headers.36

  • Docling: Its approach to chunking is inherently "context-aware" and element-based, leveraging the rich DoclingDocument object created during its parsing phase.42 It provides aHybridChunker and a HierarchicalChunker that respect the logical boundaries of the document—such as text blocks, tables, figures, and lists—that were identified by its AI models.25 This ensures that chunks correspond to the document's actual semantic units rather than arbitrary character counts.

  • Unstructured: Offers a basic chunking strategy that combines consecutive partitioned elements until a maximum character limit is reached.44 Its more advancedby_title strategy represents a powerful form of element-based chunking. This strategy uses Title elements, as identified by the partition function, to define section boundaries, ensuring that a single chunk will not contain text from two different sections.44 This method effectively uses the document's own semantic structure to guide the chunking process.


4.2. Advanced Semantic and Context-Aware Strategies


Semantic chunking moves beyond structural and rule-based methods to use the linguistic meaning of the text itself to determine the most logical split points. This is where Chonkie establishes a clear lead.

  • Chonkie: This is Chonkie's strongest and most differentiated area of functionality. It offers an unparalleled suite of advanced, semantic chunkers that incorporate recent research in the field 40:

  • SemanticChunker: Groups sentences based on the semantic similarity of their embeddings. It splits the text at points where the topical focus shifts, preserving contextually coherent passages. This approach is inspired by the popular method proposed by Greg Kamradt.1

  • SDPMChunker (Semantic Double-Pass Merge): An even more advanced technique that first performs a semantic split and then merges chunks that are semantically similar but may have been separated by irrelevant text (like page breaks or boilerplate), enhancing topical coherence.3

  • LateChunker: Implements the "late chunking" technique. Instead of chunking and then embedding, it embeds a larger portion of the document first and then derives context-aware embeddings for smaller chunks. This method has been shown to significantly improve retrieval recall by ensuring each chunk's vector representation is informed by the global document context.3

  • NeuralChunker: Utilizes a fine-tuned BERT model to predict the most appropriate split points based on semantic shifts in the text, offering another powerful method for creating topic-coherent chunks.1

  • Docling: Its primary context-aware strategy is structural, as described above.42 While it provides aHybridChunker, its native capabilities are less focused on the post-parsing semantic algorithms that define Chonkie's offering. The documentation suggests that for more advanced semantic strategies, users can integrate Docling's output with chunkers from other frameworks like LangChain, positioning Docling as a powerful pre-processor rather than an end-to-end semantic chunking solution.17

  • Unstructured: Offers a by_similarity chunking strategy that uses the sentence-transformers/multi-qa-mpnet-base-dot-v1 embedding model to group topically similar sequential elements.45 This is its primary semantic offering. However, this feature is a key example of its "open core" model, as theby_similarity strategy is only available in the commercial Unstructured API and Platform, not in the open-source library.45 This gating of advanced features represents a significant limitation for users of the open-source version.


4.3. Specialized and Agentic Chunking Approaches


This category represents the cutting edge of chunking research, involving methods tailored for specific data types like code or leveraging LLMs to perform the chunking itself. Again, Chonkie is the clear innovator in this space.

  • Chonkie:

  • CodeChunker: Goes far beyond simple text splitting for code. It uses tree-sitter to parse source code into an Abstract Syntax Tree (AST), allowing it to create structurally meaningful chunks based on logical units like functions, classes, or import blocks. It supports a wide range of popular programming languages.1

  • SlumberChunker (AgenticChunker): This experimental chunker represents a paradigm shift. It uses an LLM, accessed via Chonkie's Genie interface, to analyze the text and determine the most semantically meaningful split points, effectively simulating human reasoning and judgment in the chunking process.1

  • Docling & Unstructured: Neither library currently offers native agentic chunking or specialized AST-based code chunking. Their capability is limited to parsing code blocks as distinct elements within a larger document, which can then be passed to a specialized tool like Chonkie's CodeChunker for proper segmentation.49


4.4. Granularity, Control, and Configuration


All three libraries provide standard controls for chunk size and overlap.44 However, their unique architectures offer different levers for fine-tuning. Chonkie's power lies in the high degree of customizability of its

RecursiveChunker rules and the numerous parameters available for its advanced semantic chunkers.36 Unstructured provides unique and valuable controls for its

by_title strategy, such as multipage_sections (to control whether chunks can span pages) and combine_text_under_n_chars (to merge small, consecutive sections), which are very useful for cleaning up noisy partitioned documents.44 Docling's control is primarily at the serialization level, where developers can inject custom serializers for specific document elements (like tables) during the chunking process, offering a different axis of customization.25

The landscape of chunking strategies reveals a key philosophical divide. Docling and Unstructured pioneer element-aware chunking, which leverages the document's physical and logical structure (titles, paragraphs, tables) as the primary guide for creating chunks. This approach excels at preserving the integrity of well-structured reports and documents. In contrast, Chonkie pioneers semantic-aware chunking, which uses the linguistic meaning of the text itself to find boundaries, regardless of the original layout. This is superior for long-form, unstructured narrative text where topical shifts are not always explicitly marked by a heading. The optimal choice is therefore highly dependent on the nature of the source documents.

Table 3: Comparative Analysis of Chunking Strategies and Parameters

Chunking Strategy

Chonkie

Docling

Unstructured (Open Source)

Unstructured (API/Platform)

Fixed-Size (Token/Char)

Yes (TokenChunker) 40

Indirect (via other frameworks)

Yes (basic strategy) 44

Yes (basic strategy) 45

Recursive

Yes (RecursiveChunker, highly customizable) 40

Yes (HierarchicalChunker) 25

Yes (by_title strategy) 44

Yes (by_title strategy) 45

Element-Based

Indirect (via RecursiveChunker rules)

Yes (Core approach, context-aware) 42

Yes (by_title strategy) 44

Yes (by_title, by_page) 45

Semantic (Similarity)

Yes (SemanticChunker, SDPMChunker) 40

Indirect (via other frameworks)

No

Yes (by_similarity) 45

Semantic (Model-based)

Yes (NeuralChunker) 1

No

No

No

Late Chunking

Yes (LateChunker) 40

No

No

No

Agentic (LLM-based)

Yes (SlumberChunker) 40

No

No

No

Code (AST-based)

Yes (CodeChunker) 27

No

No

No


5. Quantitative Performance Analysis: Speed, Throughput, and Resource Footprint


Performance is a critical, non-functional requirement for production AI systems, directly impacting user experience, operational cost, and scalability. This analysis examines the performance of the three libraries across three key dimensions: processing speed, installation size and memory consumption, and the trade-offs between local and API-based deployment models. It is crucial to recognize that performance is not a monolithic concept; the "fastest" library depends entirely on the specific task being measured—parsing, chunking, or end-to-end ingestion.


5.1. Benchmarking Processing Speed and Scalability


The available data provides a clear picture of each library's performance profile, highlighting their respective strengths and weaknesses.

  • Chonkie: Positions itself as the "lightning-fast" leader in pure chunking operations.1 Its own published benchmarks, run on a large corpus of Wikipedia articles, demonstrate significant speed advantages over popular alternatives like LangChain and LlamaIndex. The results show Chonkie to be up to33x faster in token chunking, 2x faster in sentence chunking, and 2.5x faster in semantic chunking.3 This high performance is attributed to specific technical optimizations, including aggressive caching, multi-threaded tokenization withtiktoken, and the use of running mean pooling for efficient semantic calculations.2 These claims establish Chonkie as the definitive choice when the primary bottleneck is the speed of segmenting large volumes of pre-extracted text.

  • Docling: Performance benchmarks for Docling focus on the end-to-end document conversion task. A rigorous third-party benchmark analyzing PDF extraction found that Docling's processing time scales linearly with the number of pages, taking 6.28 seconds for a single-page document and 65.12 seconds for a 50-page document.6 While slower than the specialized LlamaParse, it was substantially faster than Unstructured. A user-provided benchmark further nuances this picture, showing that Docling'sbase chunker is extremely fast (throughput of 5.23 MB/s), while its more complex hybrid chunker is significantly slower (0.04 MB/s), highlighting that performance within the library is highly dependent on the chosen configuration.53

  • Unstructured: The same third-party benchmark indicates that Unstructured "struggles significantly with speed" in the context of PDF parsing, taking 51.06 seconds for one page and 141.02 seconds for 50 pages, with inconsistent scaling.6 This suggests that while it offers the broadest file support, its performance on complex, vision-heavy tasks may not be suitable for low-latency applications. Its performance is in its developer velocity for connecting to many sources, not raw processing speed.


5.2. Analysis of Installation Size and Memory Consumption


Package size and memory footprint are critical operational considerations, affecting CI/CD pipeline speed, container image size, cold-start times in serverless environments, and overall hosting costs. In this area, Chonkie's minimalist philosophy provides a stark contrast to the more "batteries-included" approaches of its counterparts.

  • Chonkie: Heavily promotes its lightweight nature as a core feature. A default pip install chonkie results in a package size of approximately 15 MB, a fraction of the size of its competitors.1 Even when optional dependencies for semantic chunking are included, the total size is around 62 MB, which it claims is still10x lighter than the competition.1 Various sources cite the base installation size as low as 9.7 MB or 11.2 MB, reinforcing its status as a lean, efficient library.14

  • Docling: Is anecdotally described by users as "super heavy".55 This is an expected and necessary trade-off for its architecture, which bundles powerful, multi-gigabyte AI models for layout and table analysis. While the initial PyPI package is small (around 160-180 kB), this is deceptive, as the library downloads the large model artifacts on first use, leading to a significant on-disk and in-memory footprint during operation.15

  • Unstructured: Is positioned by Chonkie's developers as a "bloated" alternative.2 Chonkie's comparative benchmarks place Unstructured's default installation at80-171 MB and its full installation with semantic features at a massive 625-678 MB.51 This large size is a direct consequence of its vast number of dependencies required to support its extensive file format and connector ecosystem.

The size of a library is more than a vanity metric; it is a proxy for its architectural philosophy and resulting operational overhead. Chonkie's small footprint is a direct result of its focused, specialist design and is a significant advantage for modern, containerized deployment workflows. The larger sizes of Docling and Unstructured reflect their more monolithic, platform-oriented approaches, which may be acceptable for long-running, batch ETL jobs but could pose challenges in resource-constrained or latency-sensitive environments.


5.3. Local vs. API-Based Deployment Models: Performance and Latency Trade-offs


Each library offers different models for local versus remote execution, catering to different needs for data privacy, control, and operational convenience.

  • Chonkie: Provides a flexible, three-tiered model. The open-source library is optimized for fast local execution.2 For users who prefer a managed solution, it offers aChonkie Cloud API on a pay-as-you-go basis, as well as a managed Chonkie On-Prem deployment for enterprises requiring full data sovereignty.57 This provides a clear path from local development to managed production.

  • Docling: Is designed primarily for local-first execution to guarantee data privacy and control, a key part of its appeal for security-conscious organizations.15 For scaling, it provides thedocling-serve repository, allowing users to self-host the entire toolkit as a REST API.16 It also supports pre-fetching all necessary models for use in fully air-gapped environments.56

  • Unstructured: Actively promotes a tiered approach where the local open-source library is for prototyping, while its commercial API is the recommended path for production.12 The API offers access to higher-performing models, more advanced features (likeby_similarity chunking), and better overall performance than the local version.13 Users can choose to process files locally or send them to the Unstructured API via a simple flag (--partition-by-api) in the ingest CLI.60


6. Ecosystem, Extensibility, and Developer Experience


Beyond core features and performance, the long-term viability and ease of use of a library depend heavily on its ecosystem, which includes its dependency management, documentation quality, community health, and integration landscape. A superior developer experience (DX) can significantly accelerate development and reduce maintenance overhead.


6.1. Dependency Management and Installation Complexity


The ease of installing and managing a library is a crucial first impression for any developer. The three libraries present vastly different experiences in this regard.

  • Chonkie: Excels in this area by strictly adhering to a "rule of minimum installs".1 The base library is intentionally designed with zero external dependencies for its basic functionality, ensuring a frictionless and conflict-free installation.2 More advanced features are enabled through optional extras (e.g.,pip install chonkie[openai, chroma]), allowing developers to install only what they need.1 This modular and minimalist approach is a significant DX advantage, particularly for projects with complex existing dependency trees or for deployment in lean environments.

  • Docling: Presents a more complex installation process. Its core functionality has a hard dependency on the PyTorch library, which can be challenging to install correctly across different operating systems and hardware configurations (e.g., CPU-only Linux, macOS on Intel vs. Apple Silicon, Windows with CUDA).62 The documentation provides specific guidance and alternative installation commands for these scenarios, but the potential for environment-specific issues is high. A GitHub issue, for example, highlights a dependency conflict that prevents installation on Python 3.13, indicating the brittleness that can arise from such a complex dependency.63 Furthermore, using alternative OCR engines like Tesseract requires installing separate system-level dependencies.62

  • Unstructured: Has the most complex and demanding dependency graph. A base install only supports a handful of simple text formats.64 To process the wide range of supported document types, developers must install numerous extras (e.g.,pip install "unstructured[docx,pdf,pptx]") and, more onerously, a suite of system-level dependencies. These include libmagic (for file type detection), poppler-utils and tesseract-ocr (for PDFs and images), libreoffice (for Microsoft Office documents), and pandoc (for formats like .epub and .rtf).7 Managing these external system dependencies can be a significant operational burden, complicating local development setups, Dockerfile creation, and production deployments.

This difference in installation complexity is a manifestation of each library's core philosophy. Chonkie weaponizes DX and simplicity as a key feature to attract developers frustrated with the "bloat" of larger systems. In contrast, the complexity of Docling's and Unstructured's installations is a direct trade-off for their powerful, "batteries-included" capabilities.


6.2. Documentation Quality, Community Health, and Support Channels


A strong ecosystem is built on high-quality documentation and an active, supportive community.

  • Chonkie: Provides documentation that is clear, accessible, and user-friendly, featuring a prominent "Quick Start" guide, conceptual explanations, and detailed API pages for each component.1 This high quality is noted in third-party tutorials that use the library.36 The project fosters a community through an active Discord server and offers direct email support.65 Its GitHub metrics (1.6k stars, 82 forks, 30 open issues) indicate a healthy and growing project that is still at a manageable scale.1

  • Docling: Offers extensive and professional documentation, including high-level concepts, a large collection of practical examples and recipes, integration guides, and a full API reference.24 Uniquely, it also provides a formal academic paper (published on arXiv) for those seeking a deep technical understanding of its architecture and models.5 The project's popularity on GitHub is immense (32.7k stars), reflecting its high-profile launch and backing by IBM.29 However, this popularity is coupled with a very high number of open issues (389).66 While this could be a potential red flag for maintainability, it is more likely a sign of a highly engaged community actively using the software and reporting bugs and feature requests. Developers should be prepared to consult the issue tracker for known problems.

  • Unstructured: Maintains comprehensive documentation covering both its open-source library and its commercial platform offerings.22 The documentation is detailed, but some users have reported finding it overly technical or difficult to navigate, assuming a level of prerequisite knowledge that not all users possess.37 The GitHub repository is popular (11.7k stars) and shows a healthy ratio of activity to open issues (166), suggesting a mature and well-maintained project.21


6.3. Integration Landscape: Connectors, Handshakes, and Plugins


The value of a data processing library is often measured by how well it connects to the broader data ecosystem.

  • Chonkie: Focuses its integration efforts on components directly relevant to its core chunking and embedding pipeline. It boasts over 19 integrations, which include support for 5+ tokenizer libraries, 7+ embedding model providers (like OpenAI, Cohere, and Sentence-Transformers), 2+ LLM providers, and, critically, 4+ vector databases (Chroma, Qdrant, pgvector, Turbopuffer) through its Handshakes system.1 This provides a streamlined path from chunking to vector storage.

  • Docling: Integrates deeply with major AI application frameworks, including LangChain, LlamaIndex, Crew AI, and Haystack, making it easy to drop into existing RAG architectures.15 Its origins at IBM and adoption by Red Hat are evident in its strong ties to that ecosystem, with integrations into tools like InstructLab and RHEL AI.42

  • Unstructured: Is the undisputed leader in breadth of connectivity. Its unstructured-ingest library functions as a universal data router, providing dozens of source and destination connectors. Sources include not only object stores (S3, GCS) and databases (Postgres, Snowflake) but also a wide range of enterprise applications like Salesforce, Slack, Notion, Confluence, and Google Drive. This vast connector library is arguably its single greatest strength, drastically reducing the engineering effort required to tap into heterogeneous data silos.8


7. Enterprise Readiness: Licensing, Security, and Commercial Offerings


For adoption in enterprise environments, technical features must be complemented by appropriate licensing, robust security models, and clear paths for commercial support and scalability. The three libraries present distinct models for enterprise readiness, ranging from fully open-source toolkits to mature "open core" platforms.


7.1. Open-Source Licensing and Its Implications


The choice of open-source license has significant implications for commercial use, modification, and distribution. All three libraries use permissive licenses, which are generally well-suited for enterprise adoption.

  • Chonkie: Uses the highly permissive MIT license for both its Python and TypeScript codebases.57 The MIT license imposes minimal restrictions, requiring only the preservation of copyright and license notices, which offers maximum flexibility for integration into proprietary commercial products.

  • Docling: The core docling library and its key components like docling-core and docling-parse are also licensed under the MIT license.20 This ensures that the toolkit can be freely used and embedded within commercial applications. The license for the underlying AI models must be considered separately, but the codebase itself is permissively licensed.

  • Unstructured: Primarily uses the Apache License 2.0 for its core unstructured library and unstructured-api.7 The Apache 2.0 license is also permissive and business-friendly, with the notable addition of an express grant of patent rights from contributors. Some of its client libraries, such as theunstructured-python-client, use the MIT license.71 A community concern was raised regarding a dependency onchardet (LGPL), but the Unstructured team has stated that they see no license compatibility issues with their usage.72


7.2. Analysis of Commercial Tiers and Enterprise Support


The path from an open-source prototype to a supported, production-grade system differs significantly across the three offerings.

  • Chonkie: Follows a classic open-source business model with a three-tiered offering designed to cater to different user needs 57:

  • Chonkie Library (Open Source): The core library is free, fully-featured, and can be self-hosted without restriction.

  • Chonkie Cloud (Hosted API): A managed, pay-as-you-go API that offloads the operational burden of hosting and scaling the chunking service.57

  • Chonkie On-Prem: A managed, self-hosted solution for large enterprises. This tier provides dedicated support, a private Slack channel, and professional services for deploying and maintaining Chonkie within the enterprise's own infrastructure, ensuring data privacy and control.57

  • Docling: Does not offer a direct, standalone commercial product. As an open-source project started by IBM and hosted by the LF AI & Data Foundation, its enterprise value is realized through its integration into larger commercial platforms. For example, Red Hat plans to include Docling as a supported feature in future releases of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AI (RHEL AI).42 Enterprise support for Docling would therefore be obtained through a commercial contract for a parent platform like RHEL AI. For organizations wishing to self-manage, the project provides tools likedocling-serve and a Docling Operator for Kubernetes to facilitate deployment at scale.16

  • Unstructured: Has the most mature and clearly defined commercial offering, operating on a classic "open core" model.21 The commercialUnstructured Platform is a significant extension of the open-source library, providing:

  • Tiered Deployments: SaaS Cloud-hosted (multi-tenant), Private SaaS (dedicated cloud), and VPC (fully self-hosted in the customer's cloud).13

  • Enhanced Capabilities: The paid platform offers access to superior, higher-performing models, advanced features not in the open-source version (like by_similarity and by_page chunking), and enterprise-grade compliance.13

  • Enterprise Compliance: The platform is SOC 2 Type 2 certified and HIPAA compliant, a critical differentiator for regulated industries.


7.3. Security, Compliance, and Data Sovereignty


For enterprises handling sensitive data, the ability to ensure data privacy and meet regulatory compliance is non-negotiable.

  • Chonkie: Directly addresses this through its On-Prem offering, which is explicitly designed for "Full Data Sovereignty & Security" and helps organizations meet stringent compliance requirements by keeping all data processing internal.57

  • Docling: A core design principle is its ability to run entirely locally with "no cloud dependencies, ensuring data privacy".17 This makes the open-source toolkit inherently suitable for air-gapped or highly secure environments where data cannot leave the corporate network.15

  • Unstructured: Makes compliance a central pillar of its commercial offering. Its platform is SOC 2 Type 2 certified and HIPAA compliant, providing an out-of-the-box solution for companies in regulated sectors like finance and healthcare.75 TheVPC deployment option provides "complete data ownership and infrastructure control" for maximum security.13 This leveraging of formal compliance certifications as a feature of the paid platform creates a powerful business moat, making it the path of least resistance for organizations that need to buy, rather than build, a compliant data processing solution.


8. Synthesis and Strategic Recommendations


The preceding analysis demonstrates that Chonkie, Docling, and Unstructured are not interchangeable commodities but specialized tools with distinct philosophies, architectures, and strengths. The final selection should not be based on a simple feature checklist but on a strategic alignment of the tool's core competency with the primary challenge of the project at hand. This concluding section synthesizes the findings into an actionable decision framework, proposes hybrid architectural patterns for advanced use cases, and offers a perspective on the future trajectory of each library.


8.1. The Optimal Tool for the Task: A Use-Case-Driven Framework


The most effective way to select a library is to first identify the primary bottleneck or most critical requirement of the RAG pipeline being built. The following decision matrix maps common project needs to the most suitable library.

Table 4: Decision Matrix for Library Selection Based on Use Case

Requirement / Use Case

Recommended Primary Choice

Secondary / Hybrid Option

Rationale & Key Considerations

My primary need is the absolute fastest chunking of pre-cleaned text.

Chonkie

N/A

Chonkie is purpose-built for speed, with benchmarks showing it is significantly faster at token, sentence, and semantic chunking than alternatives. Its lightweight nature is ideal for low-latency or high-throughput scenarios.11

My documents are complex PDFs (e.g., scientific papers, financial reports) with critical tables.

Docling

Unstructured (with caution)

Docling's AI models (TableFormer, DocLayNet) provide state-of-the-art accuracy for table and layout extraction, which is critical for preserving semantic integrity. Unstructured struggles with complex tables.5

I need to ingest data from a wide variety of sources (e.g., Salesforce, Notion, Dropbox) with minimal setup.

Unstructured

N/A

Unstructured's primary strength is its vast library of 50+ source and destination connectors, which drastically reduces the engineering effort required for data integration.8

I am building for a highly regulated environment (e.g., HIPAA, SOC 2) and need a commercially supported, compliant platform.

Unstructured Platform

Chonkie On-Prem / Docling (self-managed)

Unstructured offers out-of-the-box SOC 2 and HIPAA compliance. While Chonkie and Docling can be used in a compliant manner via self-hosting, the burden of securing and certifying the infrastructure falls on the user.57

I need to chunk source code with structural awareness.

Chonkie

N/A

Chonkie's CodeChunker is unique among the three, using ASTs to parse code based on its logical structure (functions, classes), which is far superior to line-based or character-based splitting.1

I need to run entirely in an air-gapped, on-premise environment with full control.

Docling or Chonkie

Unstructured (VPC offering)

Docling is designed for local-first, offline use.17 Chonkie's open-source library is fully self-hostable. Unstructured offers a commercial VPC deployment for this purpose.13

I want to experiment with the latest SOTA chunking algorithms (e.g., Agentic, Late Chunking).

Chonkie

N/A

Chonkie is the clear leader in implementing cutting-edge research, offering native support for advanced techniques like LateChunker and the LLM-powered SlumberChunker in its open-source library.40


8.2. Hybrid Architectural Patterns: Combining Strengths for Advanced Pipelines


For organizations aiming to build the most robust and highest-quality RAG systems, the optimal approach is often not to choose one library but to combine them in a "best-of-breed" pipeline that leverages their complementary strengths.

The "High-Fidelity" RAG Pipeline:

This pattern is ideal for applications built on complex, structured documents where accuracy is non-negotiable. The workflow is as follows:

  1. Parse with Docling: The raw source file (e.g., a multi-column PDF with tables) is first processed by Docling. Docling's AI models perform high-fidelity layout analysis and table extraction, converting the document into a clean, structurally-aware Markdown or JSON representation.6

  2. Chunk with Chonkie: The clean text output from Docling is then passed to Chonkie. Here, a developer can apply one of Chonkie's advanced chunking strategies (SemanticChunker, LateChunker, etc.) to segment the text in the most contextually relevant way.40

  3. Load with Chonkie: Finally, Chonkie's Handshakes feature can be used to directly embed the resulting chunks and ingest them into a target vector database like Qdrant or Chroma.14

This architecture, which has been validated by community members, ensures that the best available tool is used at each critical stage: state-of-the-art parsing for extraction and state-of-the-art chunking for segmentation, maximizing the quality of the data entering the vector store.10

The "Universal Ingestion" Pipeline:

This pattern is suited for enterprises that need to handle a massive diversity of data sources and types.

  1. Ingest with Unstructured: Unstructured serves as the universal entry point, using its extensive connector library to pull data from various sources (e.g., SharePoint, Google Drive, databases).8

  2. Triage and Route: The pipeline includes a routing logic. For simple document types or sources where Unstructured's native parsing is sufficient, the data proceeds through its internal partitioning and chunking functions.

  3. Specialized Processing: For specific, high-value document types known to be complex (e.g., all SEC filings, all scientific research papers), the pipeline routes these files to a specialized microservice running Docling for parsing and/or Chonkie for chunking before returning the results to the main workflow.

This hybrid model uses Unstructured for its primary strength—connectivity—while strategically offloading tasks that require higher fidelity or performance to the specialist tools.


8.3. Future Trajectory and Concluding Remarks


The evolution of the RAG ecosystem is moving away from monolithic, "do-it-all" frameworks toward a more mature, specialized, and modular stack. The trajectories of these three libraries reflect this trend:

  • Chonkie is positioned to continue its leadership as the premier performance-oriented and research-driven chunking library. Its future will likely involve expanding its suite of advanced chunkers, refining its cloud and on-premise commercial offerings, and maintaining its reputation for developer-friendly simplicity and efficiency.

  • Docling, with its strong academic and corporate backing, will likely remain the gold standard for high-fidelity, structured document analysis. Its future development will be closely tied to advances in its core AI models and deeper integration into the IBM/Red Hat enterprise AI ecosystem, solidifying its role in mission-critical enterprise applications.

  • Unstructured will likely continue to focus on expanding its "long tail" of connectors and file format support, reinforcing its position as the universal ETL platform for LLMs. Its commercial success will depend on its ability to make its paid platform, with its promises of higher performance and compliance, a compelling and necessary upgrade from its open-source foundation and its more specialized competitors.

In conclusion, the choice between Chonkie, Docling, and Unstructured is a strategic architectural decision. There is no single "best" library. Instead, technical leaders must analyze their specific use cases, data sources, and performance requirements to select the right tool—or combination of tools—for the job. The most sophisticated teams will embrace the modularity of the modern RAG stack, combining these powerful libraries to build pipelines that are greater than the sum of their parts.



Works cited

  1. CHONK your texts with Chonkie — The no-nonsense RAG chunking library - GitHub, accessed June 25, 2025, https://github.com/chonkie-inc/chonkie

  2. Launch HN: Chonkie (YC X25) – Open-Source Library for Advanced Chunking, accessed June 25, 2025, https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44225930

  3. chonkie/README.md at main - GitHub, accessed June 25, 2025, https://github.com/chonkie-inc/chonkie/blob/main/README.md

  4. Docling: An Efficient Open-Source Toolkit for AI-driven Document Conversion for AAAI 2025, accessed June 25, 2025, https://research.ibm.com/publications/docling-an-efficient-open-source-toolkit-for-ai-driven-document-conversion

  5. Docling Technical Report - arXiv, accessed June 25, 2025, https://arxiv.org/html/2408.09869v4

  6. PDF Data Extraction Benchmark 2025: Comparing Docling, Unstructured, and LlamaParse for Document Processing Pipelines - Procycons, accessed June 25, 2025, https://procycons.com/en/blogs/pdf-data-extraction-benchmark/

  7. unstructured - PyPI, accessed June 25, 2025, https://pypi.org/project/unstructured/

  8. Ingest dependencies - Unstructured, accessed June 25, 2025, https://docs.unstructured.io/open-source/ingestion/ingest-dependencies

  9. Unstructured - GitHub, accessed June 25, 2025, https://github.com/Unstructured-IO

  10. Run your own version of Perplexity in one single file - Part 3: Chonkie and Docling - Reddit, accessed June 25, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/Rag/comments/1gvwquh/run_your_own_version_of_perplexity_in_one_single/

  11. Reintroducing Chonkie - The no-nonsense Chunking library : r/Rag - Reddit, accessed June 25, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/Rag/comments/1jzigjb/reintroducing_chonkie_the_nononsense_chunking/

  12. Overview - Unstructured, accessed June 25, 2025, https://docs.unstructured.io/open-source/introduction/overview

  13. Overview - Unstructured, accessed June 25, 2025, https://docs.unstructured.io/api-reference/overview

  14. Chonkie, accessed June 25, 2025, https://docs.chonkie.ai/python-sdk/getting-started/introduction

  15. docling - PyPI, accessed June 25, 2025, https://pypi.org/project/docling/

  16. Docling Project - GitHub, accessed June 25, 2025, https://github.com/docling-project

  17. Docling: An Efficient Open-Source Toolkit for AI-driven Document Conversion - arXiv, accessed June 25, 2025, https://arxiv.org/html/2501.17887v1

  18. Docling Technical Report - arXiv, accessed June 25, 2025, https://arxiv.org/html/2408.09869v5

  19. Enhancing Multimodal RAG Capabilities Using Docling - Analytics Vidhya, accessed June 25, 2025, https://www.analyticsvidhya.com/blog/2025/03/enhancing-multimodal-rag-capabilities-using-docling/

  20. docling-project/docling-core: A python library to define and validate data types in Docling., accessed June 25, 2025, https://github.com/docling-project/docling-core

  21. Unstructured-IO/unstructured: Convert documents to ... - GitHub, accessed June 25, 2025, https://github.com/Unstructured-IO/unstructured

  22. Overview - Unstructured, accessed June 25, 2025, https://docs.unstructured.io/open-source/ingestion/overview

  23. unstructured 0.5.0 - PyPI, accessed June 25, 2025, https://pypi.org/project/unstructured/0.5.0/

  24. Docling - Docling, accessed June 25, 2025, https://docling-project.github.io/docling/

  25. Advanced chunking & serialization - Docling - GitHub Pages, accessed June 25, 2025, https://docling-project.github.io/docling/examples/advanced_chunking_and_serialization/

  26. Models - Unstructured 0.12.6 documentation - Read the Docs, accessed June 25, 2025, https://unstructured.readthedocs.io/en/main/best_practices/models.html

  27. CodeChunker - Chonkie Documentation, accessed June 25, 2025, https://docs.chonkie.ai/python-sdk/experimental/code-chunker

  28. [RFC] Roadmap for Q1 2025 · Issue #123 · chonkie-ai/chonkie - GitHub, accessed June 25, 2025, https://github.com/chonkie-ai/chonkie/issues/123

  29. docling-project/docling: Get your documents ready for gen AI - GitHub, accessed June 25, 2025, https://github.com/docling-project/docling

  30. Build a document-based question answering system by using Docling with Granite 3.1 - IBM, accessed June 25, 2025, https://www.ibm.com/think/tutorials/build-document-question-answering-system-with-docling-and-granite

  31. Unstructured | Get your data LLM-ready., accessed June 25, 2025, https://unstructured.io/

  32. Unstructured - Unstructured, accessed June 25, 2025, https://docs.unstructured.io/welcome

  33. Supported file types - Unstructured, accessed June 25, 2025, https://docs.unstructured.io/api-reference/supported-file-types

  34. Supported file types - Unstructured, accessed June 25, 2025, https://docs.unstructured.io/ui/supported-file-types

  35. Supported file types - Unstructured, accessed June 25, 2025, https://docs.unstructured.io/open-source/introduction/supported-file-types

  36. Chonkie-AI: Advanced Text Chunking for Better AI Retrieval & Processing - Build Fast with AI, accessed June 25, 2025, https://www.buildfastwithai.com/blogs/chonkie-ai-advanced-text-chunking

  37. Help? Unstructured.io Isn't Working — Need Help with Document Preprocessing for RAG : r/LocalLLaMA - Reddit, accessed June 25, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/LocalLLaMA/comments/1i60nwn/help_unstructuredio_isnt_working_need_help_with/

  38. docling-models - PromptLayer, accessed June 25, 2025, https://www.promptlayer.com/models/docling-models

  39. Full installation - Unstructured, accessed June 25, 2025, https://docs.unstructured.io/open-source/installation/full-installation

  40. Chunkers Overview - Chonkie Documentation, accessed June 25, 2025, https://docs.chonkie.ai/chunkers/overview

  41. [FEAT] Can Chonkie directly split a Markdown file by headers? · Issue #177 - GitHub, accessed June 25, 2025, https://github.com/chonkie-ai/chonkie/issues/177

  42. RHEL AI 1.3 Docling context aware chunking: What you need to know - Red Hat, accessed June 25, 2025, https://www.redhat.com/en/blog/rhel-13-docling-context-aware-chunking-what-you-need-know

  43. Docling - ️ LangChain, accessed June 25, 2025, https://python.langchain.com/docs/integrations/document_loaders/docling/

  44. Chunking - Unstructured, accessed June 25, 2025, https://docs.unstructured.io/open-source/core-functionality/chunking

  45. Chunking strategies - Unstructured, accessed June 25, 2025, https://docs.unstructured.io/api-reference/partition/chunking

  46. Advanced Chunking in JavaScript/TypeScript with Chonkie : r/Rag - Reddit, accessed June 25, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/Rag/comments/1kttsqk/advanced_chunking_in_javascripttypescript_with/

  47. Easy Late-Chunking With Chonkie | Towards AI, accessed June 25, 2025, https://towardsai.net/p/machine-learning/easy-late-chunking-with-chonkie

  48. Master Chunking Strategies: From Basics to Pro-Level Techniques! - YouTube, accessed June 25, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4zN07wUn4MI

  49. Docling “Enrichment Features” - DEV Community, accessed June 25, 2025, https://dev.to/aairom/docling-enrichment-features-94j

  50. Chunking strategies for RAG tutorial using Granite - IBM, accessed June 25, 2025, https://www.ibm.com/think/tutorials/chunking-strategies-for-rag-with-langchain-watsonx-ai

  51. chonkie/BENCHMARKS.md at main - GitHub, accessed June 25, 2025, https://github.com/chonkie-inc/chonkie/blob/main/BENCHMARKS.md

  52. Show HN: Chonkie – A Fast, Lightweight Text Chunking Library for RAG | Hacker News, accessed June 25, 2025, https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42100819

  53. Docling vs UnstructuredIO: My Performance Comparison : r/Rag - Reddit, accessed June 25, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/Rag/comments/1jz3og6/docling_vs_unstructuredio_my_performance/

  54. Introducing Chonkie: The Lightweight RAG Chunking Library - Deeplearning.fr, accessed June 25, 2025, https://deeplearning.fr/introducing-chonkie-the-lightweight-rag-chunking-library/

  55. What's the Best PDF Extractor for RAG? LlamaParse vs Unstructured vs Vectorize - Reddit, accessed June 25, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/LangChain/comments/1iu0ru4/whats_the_best_pdf_extractor_for_rag_llamaparse/

  56. Usage - Docling - GitHub Pages, accessed June 25, 2025, https://docling-project.github.io/docling/usage/

  57. Chonkie Documentation, accessed June 25, 2025, https://docs.chonkie.ai/getting-started/pricing

  58. From Layout to Logic: How Docling is Redefining Document AI - AI Alliance, accessed June 25, 2025, https://thealliance.ai/blog/from-layout-to-logic-how-docling-is-redefining-doc

  59. Running Docling as an API Server - DEV Community, accessed June 25, 2025, https://dev.to/aairom/running-docling-as-an-api-server-3cgi

  60. Local - Unstructured, accessed June 25, 2025, https://docs.unstructured.io/open-source/ingestion/source-connectors/local

  61. chonkie·PyPI, accessed June 25, 2025, https://pypi.org/project/chonkie/

  62. Installation - Docling - GitHub Pages, accessed June 25, 2025, https://docling-project.github.io/docling/installation/

  63. Dependency conflict on macOS (arm) · Issue #756 · docling-project/docling - GitHub, accessed June 25, 2025, https://github.com/docling-project/docling/issues/756

  64. Quickstart - Unstructured, accessed June 25, 2025, https://docs.unstructured.io/open-source/introduction/quick-start

  65. Chonkie, accessed June 25, 2025, https://docs.chonkie.ai/

  66. Issues · docling-project/docling - GitHub, accessed June 25, 2025, https://github.com/docling-project/docling/issues

  67. Docling: The missing document processing companion for generative AI - Red Hat, accessed June 25, 2025, https://www.redhat.com/en/blog/docling-missing-document-processing-companion-generative-ai

  68. chonkie - NPM, accessed June 25, 2025, https://www.npmjs.com/package/chonkie

  69. docling-parse/LICENSE at main - GitHub, accessed June 25, 2025, https://github.com/docling-project/docling-parse/blob/main/LICENSE

  70. unstructured-api/LICENSE.md at main - GitHub, accessed June 25, 2025, https://github.com/Unstructured-IO/unstructured-api/blob/main/LICENSE.md

  71. unstructured-python-client/LICENSE.md at main - GitHub, accessed June 25, 2025, https://github.com/Unstructured-IO/unstructured-python-client/blob/main/LICENSE.md

  72. Unstructured dependencies license · Issue #3894 - GitHub, accessed June 25, 2025, https://github.com/Unstructured-IO/unstructured/issues/3894

  73. Launch YC: Chonkie Open Source Data Ingestion for AI | Y Combinator, accessed June 25, 2025, https://www.ycombinator.com/launches/NUw-chonkie-open-source-data-ingestion-for-ai

  74. Unlock New Possibilities: Docling Operator Just Announced! - DEV Community, accessed June 25, 2025, https://dev.to/aairom/unlock-new-possibilities-docling-operator-just-announced-2k7h

  75. Your unstructured data Enterprise AI-ready, accessed June 25, 2025, https://unstructured.io/hidden/platform

 
 
 

Comments

bottom of page